A Survey on the Use of MySQL and MongoDB in Data-Driven Applications for Small and Medium Enterprises

Publication of IJETD

Journal Book

Abstract

The rapid increase in the digitization of data has changed the manner in which Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) interact and perceive information. Effective database systems are critical in establishing efficacy in operations, scalability and management of information with secure information management. The given paper is a comparative analysis of relational (SQL-based) and non-relational (NoSQL-based) database management systems focusing on MySQL and MongoDB, two of the most popular solutions in the SMEs. MySQL is a good example of relational databases that have gained popularity due to their maturity, ACID compliance, organized schema handling, and community support features, which have made relational databases appropriate in financial, transactional and inventory-based applications. MongoDB, the most popular NoSQL database, by contrast, is flexible in its schema, horizontally scaled, and high-performing when it comes to handling unstructured and semi-structured data, and is thus especially useful with dynamic, data-intensive apps, like those of social networks, forums, and IoT. In addition, the research paper evaluates database selection criteria used in SMEs such as cost-effectiveness, scalability, readily integrates, transaction integrity, and security. The conclusions highlight that MySQL is more reliable and consistent in structured data applications, whereas MongoDB is more flexible and adaptable in user-driven and fast-evolving environments. Finally, the database selection determined by the character of SME functioning, availability of resources, and future possibilities of scaling.

Keywords

MySQL, MongoDB, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Database Management Systems, Relational Database, NoSQL Database.

Conclusion and Future Work

MySQL and MongoDB highlight complementary strengths in meeting the diverse needs of SMEs. MySQL, as a mature relational database, offers reliability, ACID-compliant transaction processing, and strong community support, making it highly effective for structured data applications such as financial systems, e-commerce, and customer relationship management. In contrast, MongoDB, a document-oriented NoSQL database, provides superior flexibility, horizontal scalability, and efficiency in handling semi-structured and unstructured data, which is vital for dynamic use cases like forums, social networks, and IoT platforms. Various considerations, including data type, scalability needs, transaction integrity, cost, and connection with current systems, influence SMEs' decisions between the two. MySQL ensures stability and consistency in transactional contexts, whereas MongoDB enables innovation in rapidly evolving, data-driven environments. Together, they represent complementary tools rather than competitors, allowing SMEs to align database selection with business priorities. A careful evaluation of long-term goals can guide SMEs in adopting the most effective database strategy.

Future research may explore hybrid architectures that combine relational and non-relational features, supporting both structured and unstructured data in unified systems. The rise of NewSQL databases, which merge NoSQL scalability with SQL’s transactional guarantees, offers a promising direction. Additionally, with increasing reliance on cloud-native applications, further work should assess the cost, performance, and security trade-offs of deploying MySQL and MongoDB in managed cloud environments.

References

[1] M. R. Llave, “Business Intelligence and Analytics in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 121, pp. 194–205, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.027.

[2] M. Willetts, A. S. Atkins, and C. Stanier, “Barriers to SMEs Adoption of Big Data Analytics for Competitive Advantage,” in 2020 Fourth International Conference On Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS), IEEE, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICDS50568.2020.9268687.

[3] P. van Hemert, E. Masurel, and P. Nijkamp, “The role of knowledge sources of SMEs for innovation perception and regional innovation policy,” Reg. Sci. Policy Pract., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163–181, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2011.01043.x.

[4] S. Gupta, N. Agrawal, and S. Gupta, “A Review on Search Engine Optimization: Basics,” Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 381–390, May 2016, doi: 10.14257/ijhit.2016.9.5.32.

[5] A. Zacharoula, C. Koliouska, G. Tsekouropoulos, and V. Samathrakis, “E-commerce and database technology in small-medium wood enterprises in Greece,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 1152, no. Haicta 2011, pp. 901–911, 2011.

[6] S. S. S. Neeli, “Optimizing Database Management with DevOps: Strategies and Real-World Examples,” J. Adv. Dev. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, 2020.

[7] H.-J. Park, “A Study of the InnoDB Storage Engine in MySQL 5.6,” in The Ninth International Conference on Advanced Service Computing, 2017.

[8] R. Čerešňák and M. Kvet, “Comparison of query performance in relational a non-relational databases,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 40, pp. 170–177, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.027.

[9] R. K. Mishra, “Advanced Database Technologies- A Future of High Performance Database Processing,” Poona Sch. Business, Pune, India, vol. VI, no. 1, 2011.

[10] B. Sethi, S. Mishra, and P. Ku. Patnaik, “A Study of NoSQL Database,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 14–21, 2014.

[11] B. Nethravathi, A. Saruka, G. Amitha, T. P. Bharath, and S. Suyagya, “Structuring Natural Language to Query Language: A Review,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 2020, doi: 10.48084/etasr.3873.

[12] S. Butler, D. Adebanjo, and H. Ismail, “Open Source Software And Leveraging Of Business Effectiveness In Smes,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business, SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications, 2008, pp. 93–100. doi: 10.5220/0001911400930100.

[13] S. S. S. Neeli, “The Significance of NoSQL Databases: Strategic Business Approaches and Management Techniques,” J. Adv. Dev. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 11, 2019.

[14] V. Reniers, D. Van Landuyt, A. Rafique, and W. Joosen, “On the State of NoSQL Benchmarks,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering Companion, 2017, pp. 107–112. doi: 10.1145/3053600.3053622.

[15] V. M. L. G. Nerella, “Observability-Driven SRE Practices for Proactive Database Reliability and Rapid Incident Response,” Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 32–38, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.17762/ijritcc.v7i8.11710.

[16] S. Pahune, “Sensor data collection and performance evaluation using a TK1 board,” Univ. Memphis Digit. Commons, 2019.

[17] M. Stonebraker, “SQL databases v. NoSQL databases,” Commun. ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 10–11, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1145/1721654.1721659.

[18] S. S. S. Neeli, “Serverless Databases: A Cost-Effective and Scalable Solution,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Eng. Multidiscip. Phys. Sci., vol. 7, no. 6, p. 7, 2019.

[19] S. K. Naradda Gamage, E. Ekanayake, G. Abeyrathne, R. Prasanna, J. Jayasundara, and P. Rajapakshe, “A Review of Global Challenges and Survival Strategies of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs),” Economies, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 79, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/economies8040079.

[20] K. I. Satoto, R. R. Isnanto, R. Kridalukmana, and K. T. Martono, “Optimizing MySQL database system on information systems research, publications and community service,” in 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), London: IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICITACEE.2016.7892476.

[21] T. N. Khasawneh, M. H. AL-Sahlee, and A. A. Safia, “SQL, NewSQL, and NOSQL Databases: A Comparative Survey,” in 2020 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), IEEE, Apr. 2020, pp. 013–021. doi: 10.1109/ICICS49469.2020.239513.

[22] V. M. L. G. Nerella, “MIGRATE: A Rollback-Enabled Framework for Automated Oracle XTTS-Based Cross-Platform Database Migrations,” J. Electr. Syst., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 85–95, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.52783/jes.9054.

[23] D. Karanjkar, K. Barve, and M. Metri, “NoSQL Over RDBMS in Image Storing Using MongoDB,” NRCD’s Tech. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2455–166, 2019.

[24] D. Prabha, K. Devipriya, A. Priya, and P. Manivanan, “Business enterprise and Big Data: Evolving database challenges and approaches,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 627–636, 2018.

[25] P. Pathak, A. Shrivastava, and S. Gupta, “A Survey on Various Security Issues in Delay Tolerant Networks,” J. Adv. Shell Program., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2015.

[26] S. Kanoje, V. Powar, and D. Mukhopadhyay, “Using MongoDB for Social Networking Website,” in IEEE Sponsored 2nd International Conference on Innovations in Information Embedded and Communication Systems, Mar. 2015.

[27] D. D. Rao, “Multimedia-Based Intelligent Content Networking for Future Internet,” in 2009 Third UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2009, pp. 55–59. doi: 10.1109/EMS.2009.108.

[28] Y. Zhang and C. Zhang, “Applications of NoSQL Database in Modern Social Media,” pp. 1–4, 2017.

[29] C. Gyorodi, R. Gyorodi, G. Pecherle, and A. Olah, “A comparative study: MongoDB vs. MySQL,” in 2015 13th International Conference on Engineering of Modern Electric Systems (EMES), IEEE, Jun. 2015, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/EMES.2015.7158433.

[30] V. M. L. G. Nerella, “Automated Cross-Platform Database Migration And High Availability Implementation,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 823–835, 2018.

[31] S. Patel, S. Kumar, S. Katiyar, R. Shanmugam, and Rahul Chaudhary, “MongoDB vs MySQL: a comparative study of MongoDB and MySQL based on their performance,” Sch. Comput. Sci. Eng. Galgotias Univ. Gt. Noida, India, pp. 1–9, 2020.

[32] B. Jose and S. Abraham, “Performance analysis of NoSQL and relational databases with MongoDB and MySQL,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 24, pp. 2036–2043, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.634.

[33] R. Prasanna, J. Jayasundara, S. K. Naradda Gamage, E. Ekanayake, P. Rajapakshe, and G. Abeyrathne, “Sustainability of SMEs in the Competition: A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 5, no. 4, p. 100, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3390/joitmc5040100.

[34] R. Bocconcelli et al., “SMEs and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 227–254, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1111/ijmr . 12128.

[35] V. Reniers, A. Rafique, D. Van Landuyt, and W. Joosen, “Object-NoSQL Database Mappers: a benchmark study on the performance overhead,” J. Internet Serv. Appl., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s13174-016-0052-x.

[36] P. Grover and R. Johari, “MVM: MySQL Versus MongoDB,” in Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, 2016, pp. 899–909.

[37] Narra, B., Buddula, D. V. K. R., Patchipulusu, H., Vattikonda, N., Gupta, A., & Polu, A. R. (2024). The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Software Development: Trends, Tools, and Future Prospects. Available at SSRN 5596472.

[38] Achuthananda, R. P., Bhumeka, N., Dheeraj Varun Kumar, R. B., Hari Hara, S. P., & Navya, V. (2024). Evaluating Machine Learning Approaches for Personalized Movie Recommendations: A Comprehensive Analysis. J Contemp Edu Theo Artific Intel: JCETAI-115.

[39] Polu, A. R., Narra, B., Buddula, D. V. K. R., Hara, H., Patchipulusu, S., Vattikonda, N., & Gupta, A. K. Analyzing The Role of Analytics in Insurance Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Process Improvement and Business Agility.

[40] Gangineni, V. N., Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., Pabbineedi, S., Penmetsa, M., Bhumireddy, J. R., & Chalasani, R. (2024). AI-Powered Cybersecurity Risk Scoring for Financial Institutions Using Machine Learning Techniques (Approved by ICITET 2024). Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing.

[41] Vangala, S. R., Polam, R. M., Kamarthapu, B., Kakani, A. B., Nandiraju, S. K. K., & Chundru, S. K. (2024). A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Predicting and Improving Student Outcomes Using Big Educational Data (Approved by ICITET 2024). Available at SSRN 5515379.

[42] Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., Kakani, A. B., Nandiraju, S. K. K., Chundru, S. K., & Tyagadurgam, M. S. V. (2023). AI-Enabled Big Data Analytics for Climate Change Prediction and Environmental Monitoring. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(3), 71-79.

[43] Pabbineedi, S., Kakani, A. B., Nandiraju, S. K. K., Chundru, S. K., Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., & Gangineni, V. N. (2023). Scalable Deep Learning Algorithms with Big Data for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 4(1), 88-97.

[44] Bhumireddy, J. R., Chalasani, R., Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., & Penmetsa, M. (2023). Predictive models for early detection of chronic diseases in elderly populations: A machine learning perspective. Int J Comput Artif Intell, 4(1), 71-79.

[45] Polam, R. M. (2023). Predictive Machine Learning Strategies and Clinical Diagnosis for Prognosis in Healthcare: Insights from MIMIC-III Dataset. Available at SSRN 5495028.

[46] Bhumireddy, J. R. (2023). A Hybrid Approach for Melanoma Classification using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques with Deep Transfer Learning Article in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. Available at SSRN 5667650.

[47] Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., Penmetsa, M., Bhumireddy, J. R., Chalasani, R., & Tyagadurgam, M. S. V. (2022). Efficient Framework for Forecasting Auto Insurance Claims Utilizing Machine Learning Based Data-Driven Methodologies. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 1(2), 10-56472.

[48] Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., Penmetsa, M., Bhumireddy, J. R., & Chalasani, R. (2022). Designing an Intelligent Cybersecurity Intrusion Identify Framework Using Advanced Machine Learning Models in Cloud Computing. Universal Library of Engineering Technology, (Issue).

[49] Chalasani, R., Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., Penmetsa, M., & Bhumireddy, J. R. (2022). Leveraging Big Datasets for Machine Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Cybersecurity Network Traffic. Available at SSRN 5538121.

[50] Bhumireddy, J. R., Chalasani, R., Tyagadurgam, M. S. V., Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., & Penmetsa, M. (2022). Big Data-Driven Time Series Forecasting for Financial Market Prediction: Deep Learning Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 2(1), 153-164.

[51] Vangala, S. R., Polam, R. M., Kamarthapu, B., Kakani, A. B., Nandiraju, S. K. K., & Chundru, S. K. (2022). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Risk Prediction in Life Insurance Service Industry. Available at SSRN 5459694.

[52] Chundru, S. K., Vangala, S. R., Polam, R. M., Kamarthapu, B., Kakani, A. B., & Nandiraju, S. K. K. (2022). Efficient Machine Learning Approaches for Intrusion Identification of DDoS Attacks in Cloud Networks. Available at SSRN 5515262.

[53] Polu, A. R., Narra, B., Buddula, D. V. K. R., Patchipulusu, H. H. S., Vattikonda, N., & Gupta, A. K. BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL FOR CYBERSECURITY: STRENGTHS. WEAKNESSES, AND POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS.

[54] Nandiraju, S. K. K., Chundru, S. K., Vangala, S. R., Polam, R. M., Kamarthapu, B., & Kakani, A. B. (2022). Advance of AI-Based Predictive Models for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in Healthcare. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 2(1), 141–152.DOI: 10.31586/jaibd.2022.1340

Apex Academia Press